©2010-24 Margaret Deuchar, Maria del Carmen Parafita Couto, Peredur Webb-Davies, Kevin Donnelly
| 45 | MAY | soE se puede interpretar como que el laptopE que supuestamente encontraron que dijeron que había evidencia que comprobaba que EcuadorSE tenía vínculos con las FarcSE era verídico . |
| so.ADV self.PRON.REFL.MF.3SP be_able.V.3S.PRES play.V.INFIN like.CONJ that.CONJ the.DET.DEF.M.SG unk that.CONJ supposedly.ADV find.V.3P.PAST that.CONJ tell.V.3P.PAST that.CONJ have.V.13S.IMPERF evidence.N.F.SG that.PRON.REL check.V.13S.IMPERF that.CONJ name have.V.13S.IMPERF bond.N.M.PL with.PREP the.DET.DEF.F.PL name be.V.13S.IMPERF true.ADJ.M.SG | ||
| it can't be interpreted as if the laptop that they allegedly found which they claimed had evidence proving that Ecuador had links with the FARC was true. | ||
| 118 | MAY | soE si lo queremos interpretar cuál sería el incomeE limitE para hacer consideredE ? |
| so.ADV if.CONJ him.PRON.OBJ.M.3S want.V.1P.PRES play.V.INFIN which.PRON.INT.MF.SG be.V.13S.COND the.DET.DEF.M.SG income.N.SG limit.N.SG for.PREP do.V.INFIN consider.SV.INFIN+AV | ||
| so, if we want to interpret this, what would be the income limit to be considered? |
©2010-24 Margaret Deuchar, Maria del Carmen Parafita Couto, Peredur Webb-Davies, Kevin Donnelly